Paris Fashion Week Spring Summer 2019

In a word, the Spring 2019 Paris collections were reflective; serving no shortage of food for thought to the table. Whereas last season shouted for a call to action, proactively taking charge in empowering those with unheard voices (e.g the applauded Undercover collection which featured politically engaged high school teens), this season took a more reactive stance in light of current events. Designers responded to today’s political challenges in an, albeit quieter, more intense approach.  Notably, Rick Owens erected a lit pyre in the centre of the Palais de Tokyo where condemned witches were burned at the stake; an (in)direct MeToo collection featuring torch-bearing models who wore deconstructed denims and apocalyptic silk fringed mini skirts. The stripes of a charred American flag were also featured on various tops and a floor length billowing gown.Rei Kawakubo also unveiled a deeply emotional presentation at Comme Des Garçons which spoke to the “beneath the surface” psychological challenges females face; whether those be doubts of not being good/pretty/smart enough, pressures of a ticking clock, limitations of anatomy, compromising being a boss (at the risk of sounding too “bossy”), the choice of career versus carer.

This was translated through the raw padded bellies poking out from sliced open, glistening black suits- a reference to Kawakubo birthing not children, but instead a multi-million dollar empire. Chains also constricted the body underneath logo-printed second skin dresses. The chains continued to dangle from limp sleeves and past the hem, dragging onto snow white sneakers. Did she escape from her prison? Or are the chains the metaphorical constrictions a woman must deal with? While reflecting on her own journey, the collection resonated with many women whose hidden, heavy shackles are now seeing the light.Another example of a collection stepping back hitting a reflective tone was Christian Dior. Opposed to last season which was inspired by the student protests of 1968, this season Maria Grazia Chiuri focused on the art of ballet. The collection was painted by a whisper of muted colour - nudes, blush, dusty rose- and was poetic simplicity. Focus was placed on the quiet beauty of the human body and its natural curves. The uncomplicated aesthetic allows the wearer to place attention on herself and bask in a moment of tranquility. In a world of too much noise - is it not refreshing to simplify?

The hushed tones of the pieces however failed to leave a major impact due to the theatrical presentation which was accompanied by a conceptual dance piece, choreographed by Sharon Eyal. Eyal and the eight dancers delighted, but similar to the previous Dior Resort collection featuring horse riding escaramuzas, the theatrics of the fashion show outshone the clothing. It was almost that the models were getting in the way of the performance.The theatrics at Balenciaga also risked eclipsing the collection. The show blew all experience marketing endeavours to shreds as 2000 square meters of video screens aligned a digital tunnel. Here models walked on projections of psychedelic colour constellations. Fluid, neon hypnotic shapes melted into one another through a collaboration with Montreal-based artist Jon Rafman. The gargantuan show provided the setting for an equally gargantuan collection. Creative Director Demna Gsvalia, who is credited for logo mania hype and sock shoes proved his expertise in draping and innovative tailoring which would even make the maison’s founder proud. Gsvalia aspires to bring back structured elegance to the street through “neo-tailoring”. Through his technique, suits are ripened with oversized shoulders. 80s revival? NO! Here, is a fresh futuristic silhouette launched for the future.

Other fashion titans also continued to up the ante when it comes to show production. Chanel took us to the beach (well a beach was transported within the Grand Palais; sand, waves and all), Saint Laurent presenting on top a shallow water-covered runway under the lights of the Eiffel Tower, and Gucci opting out of Milan to show in Paris at the legendary nightclub Le Palace. Even with a spectacular location and the legendary Jane Birkin singing “Baby alone in Babylon”, the dazzling bells and whistles didn’t distract from the question of haven’t we seen all of this magpie geek chic glory before? Alessandro Michele is a visionary and since 2015 has successfully revived Gucci as one of the world’s leading fashion brands - it will be exciting to see him continue to push his boundaries further.However, maybe contemporary design is about developing a singular language and relentlessly sticking to those codes.

Through thick and thin - through Dior Homme, Saint Laurent and now… Celine (Céline).Of course I am referring to the polarising Hedi Slimane, who continues to be the talk of the town,  having launched his first collection as Creative Director for Celine. Slimane obliterated the once go-to brand for professional executive women, completely replacing it with his already tried and tested designs of black suits and micro-mini skirts, popularised in the early 2000s. It is unfortunate (?) presenting in the shadow of the Kavanaugh hearings but the full removal of previous creative director Phoebe Philo’s established working-woman codes reads troublesome. Not to mention these codes are now substituted by dazed youth, debauchery, drugs, sex, and rock and roll ect…Knots in our stomachs were also felt at Thom Browne who, although celebrated in blending the beautiful and the terrifying, sent models down the runway wearing Friday the 13th–style face masks, juxtaposing the couture-worthy gowns. It was not the masks which spooked. It was the fact that the models were gagged and bound - arms tightly strapped onto the torso and would thus be unable to brace a fall in sky-high heels. With it being a beach inspired collection, models were surely intended to look as if they’ve been washed ashore in fisherman’s nets, however the perceived message here was tone deaf considering the current climate of silencing women.

Being one year on from Me Too, the question holds - How do women wish to be perceived? There is a place for sexiness (e.g Jacquemus), but generally speaking there is an overwhelming movement towards modest, unfussy, not silly, let’s get down to business clothes. Clothing with a discreet sense of power with no shame in being feminine - a woman’s power suit does not need to be a masculine cut, as demonstrated by Stella McCartney and at Clare Waight Keller’s Givenchy.Despite a strong wave of genderless dressing (e.g Maison Margiela and Louis Vuitton), women don’t need to adopt masculine qualities or dress like a man to break the glass ceiling or be heard. There is power in femininity. The breathtaking beauty of dramatic, voluminous gowns at Valentino. The hypnotic concoction of rich colour, texture and pattern at Dries Van Noten. The protective armour of chain mail laced with Chantilly lace at Paco Rabane.Upon reflection, one of the most apparent trends of the Paris collections was “dressing up” - a reaction to an overly saturated, often sloppy, streetwear aesthetic.

The new season demands sharp tailoring, putting on a tie, and couture-eque details where an effort to “clean up nicely” is respected. We are living in an ugly moment in history - where victims have somehow become villains; where evidence becomes inconvenient; where hard facts are cast away as simply subjective. It’s time for the people - like you and me- to suit up and be the adults in the room, in contrast to the worse than childish characteristics of many so called leaders. Chaotic times call for decency, order and a sense of precision… cue the laser-cut double-breasted Haider Ackermann jacket.

KIM_0333.jpg
MON0207.jpg
KIM_0053.jpg
THO0653.jpg
VAL0555.jpg

The Domination of Ugly in Fashion and Politics

Whether it be reading the troubling news or scrolling through the flood of street style photographs on Instagram, it seems recently things have become a lot more ugly. According to Lyst, the leading global fashion search platform, “Ugly” was one of the most searched terms in fashion for 2017 thanks to a dominance of fanny-packs, wedgie-inducing jeans, and bulky puffer jackets featured heavily on the catwalk. The global trend has escalated especially within the footwear segment with Birkenstocks, Crocs, Uggs and in particular the chunky “Dad” sneaker legitimised by leading designers within high fashion, including Christopher Kane and Dema Gsavalia for Balenciaga and Vetements.

Within the field of fashion ugly is now respected - it is unexpected, provocative, an unflinching punch. Ugly is more interesting than the conventional notion of pretty because it gets people talking and shifts our compass of aesthetic norms and expectations. As exemplified by the collections by the likes of Miuccia Prada, promoting “ugly” design offers something new to the conversation and often acts as a catalyst for further design innovation. While the current trend for ugly arises from a mix of factors including a priority of comfort over style and an increased nostalgia for 90’s throw-backs, the composition of a general trend is much more carefully calculated and out of a consumer’s own control. Case and point: Miranda Priestly in the Devil Wears Prada explains in the famous cerulean blue sweater scene-

In a FT interview Lauren Santo Domingo, contributing editor at US Vogue and co-founder of the online luxury retailer Moda Operandi, stated that for a consumer to be convinced in a purchase, they need to see it three times: 1) on the catwalk, 2) in the form of an editorial spread, and 3) finally in store. Throughout the process, the product never changes, but the context does. This clear-cut process can even be applied to the most demanding items… enter the Gucci fur loafers AW15. Trend making can be a calculated journey which makes consumers believe own sartorial decisions are purely individual but in truth are more often decided by higher powers and subsequently trickled down.

A2X0200.jpg
balenciaga-foam-shoes.jpg

Why else would people buy platform Balenciaga Crocs for £350? Why else would people vote for a repugnant bully like Donald Trump for President?

Placing the process of fashion trend dissemination to political exploitation is the Cambridge Analytica whistleblower and PhD in fashion trend forecaster Christopher Wylie. As reported in The Observer, Wylie stated "Trump is like a pair of Uggs, or Crocs, basically. So how do you get from people thinking ‘Ugh. Totally ugly’ to the moment when everyone is wearing them?"

The same way “ugly” becomes a global trend - calculated repetition and visibility of the product.

By using the data harvested from over 87 million Facebook users, Trump was repeatedly presented again and again, in form of various tailor-made, targeted ads representing a trustworthy candidate who gets the job done. An all-American who was smeared by the fake news. A hero tackling the political correctness of the liberal establishment. You get it. They are wrong. They are “losers”. You have hopped on board a trend, a movement of something bigger.

You are wearing the Crocs instead of a hand-crafted pair of Manolo’s at the dinner party.

In fashion, trends come and go and through the digital landscape, they are extinguished as rapidly as they pop up suggesting Trump’s moment in the spotlight will soon become last season and tossed in the clearance pile. But it frightens me to think what comes next?

Paris Fashion Week SS18: The Boom is Back

And so, another season is behind us. The marathon which is fashion month is complete and the time has finally come to take a well-deserved breather, prop up those blistered and sore feet and reflect on a creatively rich month. The magic of “fashion month” lies within the culture of each fashion capital each possessing its own strengths and weaknesses, where designers and houses celebrate their own local creative scene.

This season, New York made way for a new generation of talent as established designers fled to the other side of the Atlantic, London protested against the political turmoil through vibrant colour and bling, Milan too rode the wave of resilience being upbeat and joyful, and now Paris, bursting with pulsating energy and ingenuity. SS18 was a particularly strong season, offering a range of diverse viewpoints. As per usual the mise en scène of established houses continued to impress, however unlike more recent seasons the collections of big designers were not overshadowed by the grandeur and pomp of theatrics. Best examples of the “big guns” included Louis Vuitton, Saint Laurent, and Chanel.

[embed]https://www.instagram.com/p/BZyIKBClQgH/?taken-by=modernmelange[/embed]

It is almost a given that Karl Lagerfeld presented in an over the top location - the season, bringing the jagged cliffs and powerful waterfalls of the Gorges du Verdon inside the Grand Palais… I mean, if you can’t bring the man to the mountain… This artificial presentation of nature interacted beautifully with the parading army of models clothed in clear PVC - plastic boots, hats, capes, and gloves - all to protect the delicate tweeds underneath. While a synthetic taste lingered on your tongue, you realise how appropriate the collection was in this moment of excessive materialism. However, important to note - the sun’s rays stretched into the Grand Palais and created a real rainbow in the man made waterfall. A sign of hope from the heavens? Nature overshadows all? Make what you will, but stunning beauty was accomplished.

[embed]https://www.instagram.com/p/BZzR0UMllvG/?taken-by=modernmelange[/embed]

Speaking of beauty, Nicolas Ghesquière at Louis Vuitton and Anthony Vaccarello at Saint Laurent both presented their strongest collections for their respective houses. Ghesquière creative director of a brand synonymous with travel, played on this notion however not geographically speaking, but through time travel. Capturing the sprit of 18th century Louis Quatorze and a modern day gym bug (one who wears a Stranger Things t-shirt none the less) was a playful take on the paradoxes of “high -low” “old- new” “male-female”, and this was very exciting. Vaccarello, who has previously struggled to fill the shoes of his predecessor Hedi Slimane, finally succeeded- presenting a collection of merit through excessive silhouettes and a return of YSL sensual “left bank chic” doing the runway underneath the twinkling lights of the Eiffel tower justice.

(However, leaning on heritage and brand value is not enough, which was sadly the case for Dior who is shamelessly capitalising on a feminist “trend” without backing it up with substance.)

[embed]https://www.instagram.com/p/BZzQOI-Fzhi/?taken-by=modernmelange[/embed]

Personally, best in show was, master of tailoring, Thom Browne. Not only had Browne claimed the strongest show of the season, but presented a collection which will be remembered in years to come. The American in Paris focused on fairy-tales where The Little Mermaid, Sleeping Beauty, and unicorns all played important parts. Elongated silhouettes and epic amounts of tulle were used thus producing an emotional, mystical, couture-like moment. Additional favourites included, John Galliano for Maison Margiela with experimental deconstruction, Dries Van Noten’s rich brocades, Paco Rabanne’s club-kids, Undercover Lab’s ode to Cindy Sherman and of course Pierpaolo Piccioli for Valentino. Piccioli even received a standing ovation from an overjoyed audience and fashion press hailed the collection as a triumph - which it absolutely was. Valentino Garavani, one of the most influential figures in fashion in the 20th century has found a very worthy predecessor and if there was even a shred of doubt before, this collection made the point that Piccioli is continuing to lift the brand to new highs.

[embed]https://www.instagram.com/p/BZtxYySl_gw/?taken-by=modernmelange[/embed]

Most accurate in representing today’s youth zeitgeist was Balenciaga, Y Project and Koche. Balenciaga not only conjured up the shoe of the season - the elevated croc platform - but inspired a younger generation on style notes. Accurate in a sense, as most “millennials” cannot afford the Balenciaga offering, but they do indeed purchase vintage in order to imitate modern high fashion and here Balenciaga gave opportunity to others not necessarily in their target audience. Additionally, Y Project, the IT label of the season, rooted in 90’s rave culture, is becoming the uniform for cool  kids, thanks to an counterintuitive aesthetic and meticulous draping. Koche as well continues to evolve, where this season they challenged the relationship between “high society” and football culture with tremendous  success.

[embed]https://www.instagram.com/p/BZtgbaZlh2I/?taken-by=modernmelange[/embed]

The Paris collections also provided the debuts of Clare Waight Keller for Givenchy and Natacha Ramsay-Levi for Chloé. The oomph factor was no doubt missing at Givenchy, which focused on femininity with a (semi) subversive edge albeit without a zing. For Ramsay-Levi, you could see her signature (from previously working with Ghesquière at Louis Vuitton) due to the sharp angular shapes, steering a once whimsical Chloé into a less forgiving frontier. At Chloé, gone are the days of running through wheat fields- this new Chloé gal has more important things to do, like fighting her way to the top and conquering her dreams. (Note to Dior: now THIS is a feminist collection!)

Fashion, like all industries (and areas in life), goes through booms and troughs, and this season in Paris we saw a boom offering a sense of  much needed escapism and designers looking forward to a future with hope and optimism.

Is Fashion Art? Ft. Balenciaga and Anna Sui

One of the many perks of living in London is being spoiled with world class exhibitions, celebrating many of the world’s great visionaries. This particular weekend saw the opening of two such visionaries - both very different in their own ways - Anna Sui and Cristobal Balenciaga. Interlinked with Sui drawing influence from Balenciaga, and both sparking food for thought.

London’s Victoria and Albert Museum recognised the 100th founding anniversary of “The King” of couture with a retrospective “Balenciaga: Shaping Fashion” (until 18 February 2018). The fabled  Spanish designer has been considered by Christian Dior as “The Master of us all” and by Coco Chanel “as a couturier in the truest sense of the word… The others are simply fashion designers.” Being such a pivotal figure for modern fashion shaping design, the expectations were high to do his creations and visions justice.

Having pre-booked my ticket for the exhibition’s opening, I wasn't anticipating the mass of other visitors which resulted in a bit of a push and shove fest on the very cramped floor level which featured the designer’s original designs. I found it a shame that these iconic pieces were squashed in this tiny space. To read the information plaques, everyone was peering over one another’s heads to catch a few phrases for context. Nevertheless it was a joy to see these sculptured pieces up close, appreciating each meticulous detail. The X-Ray images of two evening dresses by Nick Veasey added an excellent layer of appreciation in regards to craftsmanship and the talent of the pieces’ creator revealing the intimate secrets of the dress' unusual shaping. It also was fascinating to see the pieces ordered by Balenciaga’s loyal customers, reminding us of a extinct time when luxury meant true luxury. Again, it was a shame to cramp these iconic works of art.

[embed]https://www.instagram.com/p/BUmu42-FxA1/?taken-by=modernmelange[/embed]

In contrast, the upstair level of the exhibition was gigantic in comparison, featuring designer’s work who were either mentored by Balenciaga himself, such as Hubert de Givenchy, Pierre Cardin, or Paco Rabanne or influenced by his work such as Molly Goddard, and Rei Kawakubo among others.  Naturally, pieces by Balenciaga’s successors Nicolas Ghesquiere and Demna Gvasalia were featured emphasising that design house codes are alive and well even today. Yes, it was nice to see the comparisons of original Balenciaga and those influenced by him (even loosely), however the exhibition curated by Cassie Davies-Strodder struggled to fully capture the essence of one of the original fashion greats.

On the other hand, “The World of Anna Sui” at the Fashion and Textile Museum carefully led the audience onto a psychedelic journey, to follow the footsteps of one of America’s great designers - from her early inspirations, to mood boards from this season’s collection. Curator Dennis Nothdruft truly brought the spirit of the designer’s rock and roll romanticism into the museum tying everything together beautifully. The exhibition was a complete narrative from Sui’s inspiration as a young girl growing up in Detroit to her rapid accent to success in the early 1990’s to her reigning influence today. As the collections were not behind glasses displays, you felt more connected to them as they became part of your own world and not something separate - like the clothing Anna Sui creates. Her eclectic punk (with optimism) brought unity to each display (including Nomads, Hippies, Punks, Surfer, Androgyny to Rock Star) and made you appreciate that it's not the tailoring of techniques themselves, but the lifestyle and spirit Sui exhibits. Pure unfiltered happiness and unabashed “what you see is what you get”.

I personally did not know how much Sui shaped the aesthetics of the early 2000s. Her interpretation of punk was adopted by pop culture icons including Panic at the Disco, Simple Plan, Avril Lavigne and even my 3rd grade idol Hilary Duff  sparking a real #TBT moment. How strange to now look back at youth with nostalgia.

After the exhibition, I treated myself to a delicious gelato from Borough Market (chocolate and mango flavours), strolled across Millennium bridge and processed the significance of fashion exhibitions. Is all fashion art? Is some fashion art? Are fashion and art two separate mediums? *SPLAT* [as the chocolate gelato drips onto my blouse]

[embed]https://www.instagram.com/p/BUo7KGOljeA/?taken-by=modernmelange[/embed]

Apart from these curated exhibitions, a recent example imposing this art/fashion question is the recent collaboration between Jeff Koons and Louis Vuitton producing scarves, key chains, small leather goods, and of course hand bags. The collaboration featured five of the most famous paintings in history, including the “Mona Lisa,”  Fragonard’s “Girl With a Dog,” and Van Gogh’s “Wheat Field”. These masterpieces - priceless in their cultural value - are plastered on Louis Vuitton handbags such as the “Never-full” with each bag decorated with bling-age: fat gold or silver letters spelling the artist’s name similar to icy-fresh hip-hop jewellery. One bottom corner features “JF” - Koons’s initials and in the other corner  Louis Vuitton’s logo, with Vuitton icons sprinkled across the rest of the “canvas”. The result is at best a tacky souvenir from a museum shop.

The collaboration has in my opinion been best described by Vanessa Friedman of the New York Times:

“On one hand, Vuitton is exploiting art for its own gain. On the other, an artist is selling out. In the middle, consumers are being introduced to great art as if it is disposable.”

Nothing else needs to be said on the Koons x LV subject.

This example makes the case that fashion simply leeches off art, crunching raw human emotion and interpretation into calculated commercial outputs. However, when seeing the structural draping of  a Balenciaga, the marriage of fashion and music of an Anna Sui, the silhouette revolutions championed by a Dior of a Chanel, or the paradigm shifting provocation by a Martin Margiella, Yves Saint Laurent or Alexander McQueen - fashion and art are synonymous, they are one and the same. Oozing expression with imaginative purpose. But with short term profits overshadowing long term value, I fear we will see more Koons x LV and less Cristobal Balenciaga’s. Let's hope I’m wrong!